Would You Beat Up A Boy?

[WillamSexsphere]

Let's get the facts straight.

1. The girl is skimply clad - not an offence.

2. The boy took a picture of her, and in public - not an offence.

3. The BF wacked him - certainly an offence.

What is right and wrong is determine by law. And law is determined by majority of society. Society is made up of not just our leaders, but u and me.

It is not wrong in our liberal country for a girl to dress as she pleased as long as she dont run around naked. What constitute ' skimply' dressing? What are the limits? Best not go into there otherwise we will only repressed the freedom and rights of women. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, DONT BLAME THE WOMEN!

But blame us men for not being able to keep our horniness in check, for we are always responsible for our own actions, no one else.

Cheers!

[AD69]

Originally Posted by _AXL_

i dont agree with u, bro. no offence though. women have the right to wear whatever they want, so long that it is not indecent exposure. but taking an upskirt photo or plainly taking a photo without consent is against the privacy laws here. the subject in the photo has every right to demand that the pic be deleted.

no such thing as 引人犯罪... arent we supposed to be civilised human beings able to differentiate from right and wrong??? do u see the upskirt videos posted here??? sometimes i wonder how i would feel if my loved one is the one who is a victim of it...

Bro,

Don't worry, no offence taken.

In the first place, the boy did not take an up-skirt photo of the gal.

Like the rest of the bros and sis here wrote, if she dares to wear skimpy clothes, she should be not afraid to have such unwanted attention, zao genged, photo being taken etc.

As for taking up skirt photos and video with intention, that is definately a wrong doing.

[Castrol]

Originally Posted by WillamSexsphere

Let's get the facts straight.

1. The girl is skimply clad - not an offence.

2. The boy took a picture of her, and in public - not an offence.

3. The BF wacked him - certainly an offence.

and justice for all!

[Ricorite]

Actually you dont have to lay hands on the boy. Just use the emergency speaker and speak to the train Captain, then get the control station stuff to come down and detain the boy then call police.

CASE CLOSED.

Let the boy give his grandfather grandmother story at the police station.

KIDS these days are not that innocent anymore.

[tomvoyeur]

Originally Posted by dnagene_gal

Speaking from the feminine side, if you dare to wear so skimpy, dont be afraid to have such unwanted attention or even to be zaogenged. Cos its the female's fault. If so scared, don't wear. If bf is the sort of overzealous kind, all the more dont wear, else bf will bash up any guys that check gf out!

That's certainly a rare opinion coming from the female side but in this case we really need to ascertain what kind of zaogeng we r talking about here...One type is where an offender uses intent n methods to capture / see a victim's outer wear. The other type is accidental exposure where the victim unknowingly expose himself / herself. The former is uncalled for as this constitute an outrage of modesty n I dun think any woman in the right mind should condone that...But if this pertains to the latter scenario, then I agree that the victim should not be blaming others for her actions n choice of clothings....Just my opinion..

[tomvoyeur]

Originally Posted by dominion

in a country where armed policemen ran away from unarmed banglas who threw rubbish bins at them, what can one expect?

Perhaps the police is under directive not to harm foreign talents...

[tomvoyeur]

Originally Posted by WillamSexsphere

1. The girl is skimply clad - not an offence.

2. The boy took a picture of her, and in public - not an offence.

3. The BF wacked him - certainly an offence.

Well-presented points!There is simply no case against the boy for taking a non-lewd picture of a scantily clad lady in public...However, the aggressive boyfren can be charged for criminal intimidation if the police / boy's family decide to press charges...

There is no legal requirement for a person to seek permission from the intended target for him / her to take pictures as trademark issues do not apply for a person's pictures taken in public spaces. This applies even for celebrities. But the law do prosecute people who maliciously undertake actions to outrage a woman's modesty...In this case, there is no evidence to suggest the latter act has taken place....

I fully emphatise with the boy and hope he can recover from this traumatic experience speedily...In a nutsell, this is a case of a zealous bf going overboard with his actions n his intimidating method of resolving the issue should not be condoned....my 2cents worth..

[jackylee]

What i think is what the man did is not wrong...

The boy might be young but that does'nt mean he does'nt have to pay for what he did wrong...


All the fetishes (of people beoing your gf or etc you high) aside... i don't think any guys will want others taking pic of your gf... see see.. bo bian.. but in this society now... pics taken liao u duno wad happen to it...

They shouldnt put camera with phone... really

[dirtyhairy]

Originally Posted by dnagene_gal

Yes, nobody has the right to take her photo without her consent. But she can't stop them if they take, since she was inviting attention by wearing skimpily.

Yes, she cant stop them for taking fotos,
so her BF stopped the boy for her loh
imagine how society will becum really
if based on your views they are to be
let's say you try to dress like Mother Theresa
becos you re not only religious, you treat sex like you treat SARS
so naturally, you dress properly, not skimpy
but unlike Mother Theresa. you look dammed sexy
becos of your two natural big knockers, you are so busty
then along comes a dirtylaobaby aged 70 going 80
suddenly on seeing you, he becums horny
shoves his hands and grabs at your titties
he's not only embarrassing you, he's outraging your modesty
your BF with you becums angry
he whacks ah lao so badly that he has to be admitted to hospital Changi
now if tat's you and yr BF, is this justified, you tell me.
So to pass judgement without appreciating the facts fully,
may be easy but it is folly

[no_faith]

Originally Posted by musedragon

Hey Gal,
I am getting confused with your string of postings in this thread. You seemed to be going everywhere with your POV; from saying that girls shouldnt be wearing skimpy clothes if they dont want to invite unwanted attention and then you go on to describe how you yourself got into the same situation.

ttz my point too,

[Cocky]

Originally Posted by dnagene_gal

From what I feel, if the bf can get so violent and over-protective to that extent... He should discipline his gf and tell her not to wear such skimpy clothes. It's also her fault lor.

Whenever there are people who look at zaogeng girls or what, most people will say its the guys' fault. But if the girls dont dress in that way to attract such unwanted attention.. Nothing will happen right?

Speaking from the feminine side, if you dare to wear so skimpy, dont be afraid to have such unwanted attention or even to be zaogenged. Cos its the female's fault. If so scared, don't wear. If bf is the sort of overzealous kind, all the more dont wear, else bf will bash up any guys that check gf out!

I do not agreed to your point of view. It is true that if a laby is skimpy and sexy dress, as men we will sure see or look. Which is total fine as long as you see and look. But if you use a camera to take the photo than is wrong. As long as the cha bo willing to wear skimpy or sexy, she sure know that men will all see and look but that dont mean you can take her photo without her consent with a camera.

[Garick]

well, sg are getting more open and westernised to certain extent plus the fact that this is a warm country, it'll certainly affect e way of dressing..so meaning more and more women will be out with skimpy clothings..

my guess is, assuming if the boy is in some voyeur gang, as previously said by some bro, his hp will have tons of zaogeng pics..

so forgive him, he is also in the making of a man

[RICHIE72]

All of us humans have an inherent nature to admire beauty. For the boy to "secretly" snap a picture of an unknowing lady, whether scantily dressed or fully clothed, constitutes to an invasion of one's privacy. However, for the adult to wave his "mighty" fist at the helpless boy, no matter what wrong he has done, is acting in a cowardly manner. I mean, what do you expect a boy to do against an adult who might even be old enough to be his brother or uncle. I think we need to learn to put things right, through the proper channels.

[The_Unrepentant]

Originally Posted by WillamSexsphere

What is right and wrong is determine by law. And law is determined by majority of society. Society is made up of not just our leaders, but u and me.

wrong. laws are certainly not determined by majority of society. it never was and it never will be. Instead, it is determined by the powerful minority capitalist and moral entrepreneurs to protect the rich and powerful.

[The_Unrepentant]

y is it okay to see ? because u look at them so u say is ok? because u never take photo so it's ok?

Y is it not okay for ppl to take photo? Invasion of privacy? wat is invasion of privacy? who determines invasion of privacy is wrong? wat harm does invasion of privacy actually do to the victim ? so tat when more ppl can see her scantily dressed clothes, it suddenly harms her???